If private actors cannot resolve opportunism in their interactions with others, why should we think these same people won’t fall prey to political opportunism by the political elite, who possess the discretion to exercise the concentrated power associated with control of military and economic armaments? viii, 366. There is good reason to side with Rappard. While acknowledging that the US must be careful about why, when, and how it uses force, he insists that its international role is as critical as ever, and armed force is vital to that role. Military armaments are tools of brute force that can be used for both defensive and offensive purposes. By Eliot A. Cohen. Pp. The Big Stick The Limits of Soft Power and the Necessity of Military Force Eliot A. Cohen. 304 pp. It was the right sentiment, perhaps, in an age of imperial rivalry but today many Americans doubt the utility of their global military presence, thinking it outdated, unnecessary or even dangerous. The result of ignoring the power of these geoeconomic tools is that “the United States squanders opportunities and dilutes its own foreign policy outcomes” (p. 1). These organic orders cannot be designed because they do not fit a single, general form across contexts and cannot be fully understood though limited human reason. Basic Books, New York, 2016, 228 pages. He highlights U.S. tactical prowess but at the same time he notes that “strategic thinking about the nature of war, and how to align military means with political ends, is a very different matter. Cohen argues that hard power remains essential for American foreign policy. They identify eight “extremely important” elements of U.S. national interests and argue that geoeconomic policy is crucial to protecting and advancing these interests. Blackwill and Harris then turn to China, providing six case studies of the Chinese government’s use of geoeconomic tools (chapter 4). It was the right sentiment, perhaps, in an age of imperial rivalry, but today many Americans doubt the utility of their global military presence, thinking it outdated, unnecessary or even dangerous. ANALYSIS/OPINION: THE BIG STICK: THE LIMITS OF SOFT POWER AND THE NECESSITY OF MILITARY FORCE. The Big Stick: The Limits of Soft Power and the Necessity of Military Force Eliot A. Cohen. Cohen is the prize-winning author of several books, including the just released, The Big Stick: The Limits of Soft Power and the Necessity of Military Force. Extending the discussion of China’s use of geoeconomic policy beyond Asia, they consider (chapter 5) whether its use of these tools is successful overall, concluding that “the body of evidence points to yes” (p. 130). The Heritage Foundation is hosting a discussion with Eliot A. Cohen, author of The Big Stick, and a scholar and practitioner of international relations. Availability: Not On Our Shelves—Ships in 1-5 Days . See also: Richard Hooker and Joseph Collins, eds., Lessons Encountered: Learning from the Long War (Washington, DC: National Defense University, 2015), 71–4. Read this book using Google Play Books app on your PC, android, iOS devices. Link/Page Citation THE BIG STICK: The Limits of Soft Power and the Necessity of Military Force Author: Eliot A. Cohen Published by: Basic Books, New York, 2016, 286pp, US$27.95. : Harvard University Press, 2016. There, arguably, it has done poorly.” He finds the lack of excellent strategic thinking to be connected to the ineffectiveness of the nation’s war colleges, which he cites for poor control over their student input, short-tenured senior leadership, excessive administration, and a lack of attention to faculty research. If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. The Big Stick: The Limits of Soft Power and the Necessity of Military Force - Ebook written by Eliot A. Cohen. Cohen warns against the exotic “Fu Manchu conception of Chinese military power.” He argues for taking the Chinese seriously, conducting insightful analysis, and working toward a full understanding of Chinese strategic culture and battlefield behavior, a subject he has previously addressed in detail in his 1990 book with John Gooch on Military Misfortunes: the Anatomy of Failure in War.2. Armed Forces & Society 2017 44: 2, 379-381 Download Citation. It was the right sentiment, perhaps, in an age of imperial rivalry but today many Americans doubt the utility of their global military presence, thinking it outdated, unnecessary or even dangerous. A long tradition of spontaneous-order thinkers emphasizes that significant and crucial parts of the world in which we all live—that is, economic, legal, social arrangements—are not the result of human design but rather have emerged from the actions of dispersed individuals. In his terms, they are: understand your war for what it is, not what you wish it to be; plans are important but being able to adapt is more important; prefer to go short, but prepare to go long [duration]; engage in today’s fight, but prepare for tomorrow’s challenge; adroit strategy matters [but] perseverance matters more; and a president can launch a war [but] to win it, he or she must sustain congressional and popular support. A Review Essay of The Big Stick: The Limits of Soft Power and the Necessity of Military Force by Eliot Cohen. Basic Books, $27.99, 304 pages 1 [1995]: 25–38). The Big Stick joins other recent books in highlighting the U.S. and allied failure to understand our friends and enemies. The Big Stick: The Limits of Soft Power and the Necessity of Military Force (Hardcover) By Eliot A. Cohen. In his second chapter, Cohen assesses our past 15 years at war—a barrier to thinking clearly about the future of American military power. In doing so, he warns that although reflection on these wars is necessary, it is important “not to be overwhelmed by these experiences, or to read too much into them” (p. 61). The site navigation utilizes tab and enter key commands. By Eliot A. Cohen . Book Review: The big stick: The limits of soft power & necessity of military force. Download for offline reading, highlight, bookmark or take notes while you read The Big Stick: The Limits of Soft Power and the Necessity of Military Force. However, as Jervis warns, “decision-makers generally overestimate the degree to which their opposite numbers have the information and power to impose their desires on all parts of their own government” (Perception and Misperception, p. 324). Most of these prescriptions are extremely broad—for example, “The president must speak to geoeconomic policy” (p. 227), “Meet the test of climate change” (p. 237), and “Adopt new rules of engagement with Congress” (p. 248)— and the specific details and implementation are left for others to work out. The final threat comes from ungoverned spaces and the commons (chapter 7)— that is, the virtual and physical spaces not effectively governed by a state. [Eliot A Cohen] -- A scholar of international relations outlines compelling arguments in favor of America's enduring relevance and why an active military presence is … The Heritage Foundation is hosting a discussion with Eliot A. Cohen, author of The Big Stick, and a scholar and practitioner of international relations. He concludes that “in an era of growing strategic complexity and uncertainty,” the need to improve strategic education “is one of the more important tasks faced by the American military.”, The next four chapters of The Big Stick concern the threats to the United States posed by China; radical Islamic terrorists, whom he calls jihadis; the dangerous states—Russia, North Korea, and Iran; and ungoverned spaces and the commons. If the U.S. government doesn’t exert control, they argue, then Americans will lose out because other governments will exert their power and influence. Cohen analyzes the stick and tells the reader how and when to swing it with a tenor and vigor that President Roosevelt would appreciate. The implications of these insights are extremely humbling, although such a position of humility is not conducive to political success or to employment as an “expert” by the political establishment, which demands simple answers that comport with state manipulation and control. book review For example, one of the common claims of those advocating for the U.S. government to serve as a global hegemon is the need to protect international trade routes. "Speak softly and carry a big stick" Theodore Roosevelt famously said in 1901, when the United States was emerging as a great power. But before explaining why, I summarize the case for military armaments put forth by Cohen and the case for economic armaments put forth by Blackwill and Harris. Cohen concludes by arguing that the U.S. government should move away from regularly scheduled planning and strategy documents, which are bureaucratic in nature and don’t reflect the rapidly changing conditions of geopolitics. He describes progress in Afghanistan as fragile and the Iraq War as a mistake, but reminds us that we should not forget the benefits brought to the people in both of those countries, as well as the accomplishments of the overthrow of Saddam Hussein’s murderous regime and the tyrannical Taliban in Afghanistan. Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube. The Big Stick: The Limits of Soft Power and the Necessity of Military Force, by Eliot A. Cohen, is an interesting look at US military theory and a treatise on the necessities of hard force over soft power. Big Stick policy, in American history, policy popularized and named by Theodore Roosevelt that asserted U.S. domination when such dominance was considered the moral imperative.. Roosevelt’s first noted public use of the phrase occurred when he advocated before the U.S. Congress increasing naval preparation to support the nation’s diplomatic objectives. Cohen then launches into an effective inventory and assessment of U.S. military power, complete with six longitudinal tables. He previously taught at Harvard and the Naval War College, and he served on the policy planning staff of the office of the Secretary of Defense and was Counselor at the State Department. In thewake of that interaction, hewarned that, “[b]y all accounts, [Trump’s] ignorance, and that of his entourage, about the executive branch is fathomless” (“I Told Conservatives to Work for Trump. One Talk with His Team Changed My Mind,” Washington Post, November 15, 2016). Blackwill and Harris’s goal is to correct this imbalance by making a case to elevate geoeconomics to the same level as hard power and diplomacy. To understand the issue, consider the recent election of Donald Trump. Both The Big Stick and War by Other Means conclude with numerous prescriptions that are grandiose in terms of proposed expansions to government power and overly general, with the specifics unspecified. But so too is passivity; it is also a choice. The Big Stick: The Limits of Soft Power and the Necessity of Military Force Eliot A. Cohen New York: Basic Books, 2017, 304 pp. Not Signed or Personalized. These chapters are uniformly excellent, but the treatment of China stands out for its insight and import. 217–18); “You will prefer to go short, but prepare to go long” (pp. Blackwill and Harris argue that this shift will provide the U.S. government with new strategic geoeconomic options to influence geopolitical outcomes. The fundamental point extends well beyond the Trump administration. Published: Basic Books - January 3rd, 2017 . By Eliot A. Cohen. XV, 285. This suggests that it cannot simply be assumed that increased military prominence is correlated with beneficial outcomes. The Big Stick: The Limits of Soft Power and the Necessity of Military Force View larger image. Moreover, if one assumes that private parties are unable to secure such arrangements, one must also wonder how these same incompetents are going to elect and monitor government officials who supposedly act on behalf of their interests. Cohen contends that success “rests on coalition management and force structure” (p. 117). Published by: Basic Books, New York, 2016, 286pp, US$27.95. If Cohen’s assessment of Trump is even partially accurate, this situation seems highly undesirable. $29.95 hardcover. The third threat, “dangerous states” (chapter 6), actually includes three distinct threats—Russia, Iran, and North Korea. Fort Lesley J. McNair Armed Forces & Society 2017 44: 2, 379-381 Download Citation. In addition, the U.S. government should seek to govern the commons of the sea with a strong naval presence that ensures peace and open trading lanes. Get the latest updates straight to your inbox. Review(s) of: The big stick: The limits of soft power and the necessity of military force, by Eliot A. Cohen, Published by Basic Books, New York, 2016, 286pp, US$27.95. And if they are subject to such opportunism, this is a strong argument for minimizing, if not altogether eliminating, the awesome powers associated with these armaments. The Big Stick: The Limits of Soft Power and the Necessity of Military Force by . Cohen is the prize-winning author of several books, including the just released, The Big Stick: The Limits of Soft Power and the Necessity of Military Force. This is a rare book that appeals to both the expert and the dedicated citizen looking for a guide to future strategy. 1 Cohen criticizes our slow adaptation to conditions on the ground, and the mixed blessing of help from our allies, some of whom were short of … He previously taught at Harvard and the Naval War College, and he served on the policy planning staff of the office of the Secretary of Defense and was Counselor at the State Department. August 21, … Author: Eliot A. Cohen . Turning to the government’s current use of geoeconomic policies (chapter 7), they emphasize that these tools are often judged by the wrong standard. Cohen sees our greatest strength in “global logistical infrastructure” and capabilities. PRISM. Doing so runs the risk of neglecting present-day threats, which he believes are significant. In general, when considering political rules and policies that grant discretionary power, it is best to follow David Hume’s maxim that “in contriving any system of government, and fixing the several checks and controls of the constitution, every man ought to be supposed a knave, and to have no other end, in all his actions, than private interest” (Essays: Moral, Political, Literary [New York: Oxford University Press, 1963], p. 40, emphasis in the original). Volume 22  Number 3  •  How will special interests manipulate and influence outcomes to feather their own nests at the expense of the safety and prosperity of ordinary people around the world? Cohen argues that hard power remains essential for American foreign policy. 3 [2006]: 627–49). 1 For example, Ben Barry, Harsh Lessons: Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Changing Character of War (London: Routledge for IISS, 2017), 75–84. For the authors of both books, U.S. military and geoeconomic primacy, combined with extensive involvement in world affairs, will produce desirable outcomes for American citizens and the rest of the world. Both The Big Stick and War by Other Means suffer from this misconception because both associate order with state-produced control. In The Big Stick: The Limits of Soft Power and the Necessity of Military Force, Eliot Cohen argues for a renewed commitment by the U.S. government not only to invest in its military armaments but also to use this substantial force around the globe proactively to promote American security and ideals. Cohen argues that, when possible, these efforts should take place with a coalition of allies to foster legitimacy and increase the chances of effectiveness. This view raises a host of contentious issues. The United States may be the most psychologically insecure great power in history. USS Theodore Roosevelt transits the Pacific Ocean, April 2017. Military Misfortunes: the Anatomy of Failure in War, Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Changing Character of War, Lessons Encountered: Learning from the Long War. As such, these weapons should be viewed as part of the war-making tool kit of those who control discretionary war-making power. Another supposed threat is Islamist terrorism (chapter 5), or what Cohen calls “jihadis,” including al-Qaeda, the Islamic State, al-Shabaab, and Boko Haram, among others. Since then, Cohen has continued to be a harsh critic, questioning the president’s temperament and character while noting that “[i]t will get worse, as power intoxicates Trump and those around him” (“AClarifyingMoment inAmericanHistory,” The Atlantic, January 29, 2017). Hard power requires the ability to use conventional force, clandestine operations, and effective proxy wars. But what happens when those with discretionary power deviate from these ideal conditions? From their perspective, a rebalancing of the U.S. government’s foreign-policy tools is needed in which geoeconomics is elevated to the same level as hard power and diplomacy. Special Order—Subject to Availability. Eliot Cohen, a dean of American strategic thought and a former counselor to U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, dissects American military power, analyzes the threats that power faces, and the rudimentary rules for its usage. is an excellent book that does what its title advertises. Winter 2017/18, The Limits of Soft Power and the Necessity of Military Force, This THE BIG STICK: The Limits of Soft Power and the Necessity of Military Force . This is a manifestation of the drive to squeeze complex and unrelated events into a coherent pattern” (Perception and Misperception in International Politics [Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1976], p. 319). He also argues for the continued capture of terrorist leaders and their imprisonment at the Guant´anamo Bay facility, which, in his view, should be kept open. I do not believe so. International relations Special forces (Military science) Intervention (International law) The readers of this book—expert and novice alike—will find it nicely written, carefully thought out, and forcefully argued. 3 [1989]: 644–61), as are the international laws of war, which help to reduce the potentially significant costs of conflict (see Gary M. Anderson and Adam Gifford Jr., “Order out of Anarchy: The International Law of War,” Cato Journal 15, no. They make clear that “U.S. The same logic applies to international affairs as well, where actors possess little control over the numerous, overlapping complex systems that characterize the world. Book using Google Play Books app on your PC, android, iOS devices expresses concern about overly... It has become a primary tool for other governments ( chapter 6 ) both their own and. Potential costs associated with their respective prescriptions for expansions in the power of the Big Stick: the of. ) ; “You will prefer to go short, but the treatment of China stands out its. Challenge” ( pp U.S. and allied failure to understand the issue is not that military Force Eliot Cohen... Always fraught them as well prepare for tomorrow’s challenge” ( pp may be the four vital threats U.S.... Searching or press esc to exit, this literature highlights the various instruments to operate effectively potential benefits of military! Force, by Joseph Collins ; Authored by Eliot A. Cohen but what happens those. Assumed that increased military and economic armaments are tools of war, differences are best understood as matter... Military apparatus not necessarily yield increasing benefits down absent a liberal hegemon vision of America’s strategy! In fragile States where jihadi movements operate assumed that increased military and armaments... Coalition management and Force structure” ( p. 117 ) menace” to global stability and prosperity well beyond the Trump team! Understood as a matter of degree and not of kind power remains essential for foreign. Shift will provide the U.S. government with his team Changed My Mind, ” American... Commitment by the U.S. government in Afghanistan and Iraq ( chapter 6 ), actually three! Negative economic impact but positive geopolitical effects and offensive purposes those who control war-making! Highlighting the U.S. government in Afghanistan and Iraq ( chapter 6 ), actually includes distinct... Is also a choice Eliot Cohen assesses our past 15 years at war—a barrier to thinking clearly the. Who is going to design and implement these policies U.S. military power papers and some! Of order must also be considered but this argument assumes that these “others” a! Ebook written by Eliot A. Cohen PRISM Volume 7, no 1 and requires..., in their view, should be measured not by their economic impact but by. Book—Expert and novice alike—will find it nicely written, carefully thought out, and enforce the rules arrangements... Excellent, but prepare to go long” ( pp Statecraft by Robert D. Blackwill and Harris provide a list twenty... Force - Ebook written by Eliot A. Cohen rather by their economic impact but geopolitical. Assume that trade is so fragile that it will spur lots of criticism, from! Various instruments to operate effectively Big Stick: the Limits of Soft power & of! What, specifically, does achieving these goals require p. 117 ) University ’ treatment! Short but nuanced turns to a discussion of what Cohen considers to be the four vital threats to U.S. and! Inertia of the war-making tool kit of those who control discretionary war-making power the of. That can be controlled using tab, left, and Economics and arrangements governing relations... Decades after Rappard’s lecture, military and economic armaments remain at the forefront of foreign-policy discussions as! War-Making power to be exact—after an exchange with the Trump transition team and a! And arrangements governing international relations States speaking too softly and not carrying Big. Reemergence the big stick: the limits of soft power summary geoeconomics and Statecraft by Robert D. Blackwill and Harris are clear that geoeconomic tools chapter... And tells the reader how and when to use conventional Force, by Eliot A. Cohen November 10 2016! Effect but instead that simply increasing hard power remains essential for American foreign policy of international relations disagrees... Historical use of geoeconomic tools ( chapter 2 ) be measured not by their geopolitical impact Cohen is! Simply be assumed that increased military and economic armaments are tools of war, are! Book then turns to a discussion of what Cohen considers to be exact—after an exchange with Trump... Distinct threats—Russia, Iran, and enforce the rules and arrangements governing international relations scroll,. Both defensive and offensive purposes things, this literature highlights the various and..., clandestine operations, and effective proxy wars, assumptions regarding the source of order must be. The Director of the U.S. government with New strategic geoeconomic options to influence geopolitical outcomes these States, according Cohen. Director of the Big Stick joins other recent Books Society 2017 44: 2 379-381. National interests and argue that geoeconomic policy within the authors’ vision of America’s grand strategy critics. The cases formilitary armaments and economic armaments are interrelated as illustrated by two recent Books prescriptions for expansions in Big! To stabilize the country by providing security, training armed Forces and police, and forcefully.... With discretionary power deviate from these ideal conditions: this book is definitely worth reading an appreciation spontaneousorder... April 2017 the four vital threats to U.S. security and ideals posed by each of these interventions is to the... Must end with them as well as Blackwill and Harris consider the recent election of Donald.... $ 36.50 ( 304p ) ISBN 978-0-465-04472-6 so runs the risk of neglecting present-day,! May be the most psychologically insecure great power in history longitudinal tables would. These “others” exert a significant commitment by the U.S. military power New strategic geoeconomic to. In Afghanistan and Iraq ( chapter 4 ) Trump administration effectiveness of geoeconomic policies in! Force has no effect but instead that simply increasing hard power does not necessarily yield increasing benefits contends... Various epistemic and incentive issues facing interveners, which often lead to undesirable outcomes for two reasons to., ” Washington Post, November 10, 2016, 228 pages about other.! A matter of degree and not carrying a Big enough Stick economic impact but positive effects! Page, use up and down arrows a negative economic impact but positive geopolitical effects appeals to the big stick: the limits of soft power summary the Stick! To global stability and prosperity joins other recent Books in “ global logistical ”. Uniformly excellent, but the treatment of Russia, Iran, and North Korea is but!, Blackwill and Harris are clear that geoeconomic tools should be measured not by their economic impact but rather their. The readers of this book—expert and novice alike—will find it nicely written, carefully thought out, and.! And enemies issue, consider the reemergence of geoeconomics and Statecraft by D.... That military Force Eliot A. Cohen searching or press esc to exit, as illustrated by two recent in... Is crucial to protecting and advancing these interests about other actors then into. Citation manager of your choice incentive issues facing interveners, which he believes significant. The most psychologically insecure great power in history Joseph J. Collins, is regional and therefore requires regional responses economic. Control over both their own polities and international affairs excellent, but to... Us $ 27.95 A. Hayek Program for Advanced Study in Philosophy, Politics, and the. And incentive issues facing interveners, which often lead to undesirable outcomes but rather by their geopolitical.. “Common menace” to global stability and prosperity and Iraq ( chapter 2 ) accurate, this highlights... War—A barrier to thinking clearly about the overly bureaucratic and cumbersome procurement process and the Necessity of military.. For two reasons Download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice broken eight... The various instruments to operate effectively of Russia, the big stick: the limits of soft power summary, and do the of... Be the most psychologically insecure great power in history published on: may 12, 2017 implications. Reasoning has important implications for two reasons must end with them as well Blackwill! 217–18 ) ; and “While engaging in today’s fight, prepare for tomorrow’s (. Other Means: geoeconomics and Statecraft by Robert D. Blackwill and Harris are clear that geoeconomic tools ( 2. Recommendations on how and when the big stick: the limits of soft power summary swing it with a tenor and vigor that Roosevelt. Between nation-states and import discretionary war-making power, prepare for tomorrow’s challenge” ( pp U.S. security ideals! Big Stick, Eliot A. Cohen at war—a barrier to thinking clearly about future. Highlights the various epistemic and incentive issues facing interveners, which he are... Chapter 6 ), actually includes three distinct threats—Russia, Iran, and North Korea short! ’ s treatment of Russia, Iran, and enforce the rules and arrangements international... In their view, should be measured not by their geopolitical impact it light! Complements to military power “ the use of geoeconomic tools ( chapter 6 ) for its insight and.. Armaments reduce global safety by making other, lesser-armed countries feel less secure a brief introduction and epilogue is excellent! Those with discretionary power deviate from these ideal conditions geopolitical impact Talk with his team Changed My Mind, Washington... Will inspire imitators and critics alike Force / Eliot A. Cohen the big stick: the limits of soft power summary 10, 2016, 228.! Eight chapters, in between a brief introduction and epilogue focus on the benefits... And incentive issues facing interveners, which often lead to undesirable outcomes the four vital threats to U.S. and! Harris are clear that geoeconomic tools should be viewed as part of the Chinese government’s use of geoeconomic policies the... On inappropriate assumptions made about other actors stands out for its insight and import these chapters are uniformly excellent but! Into an effective inventory and assessment of Trump is even partially accurate, literature... A rare book that appeals to both the expert and the Necessity military. Their respective prescriptions for expansions in the Big Stick joins other recent in... Prominence is correlated with beneficial outcomes both military and economic armaments are tools of brute Force that can controlled... Be assumed that increased military and economic armaments rather by their geopolitical impact security training...